United States v. Carl Dean Knox
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
Carl Dean Knox was charged in separate indictments with having robbed a St. Louis bank and having attempted a second robbery of the same bank. The offenses alleged constitute separate violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). The charges were consolidated for trial, pursuant to Rule 8(a), F.R.Cr.P., 18 U.S.C., and over the objection of defense counsel. A jury found Knox not guilty of the initial robbery and guilty of the subsequent attempted robbery. Knox has appealed from the judgment of conviction.
Apparently, the court reporter’s trial tapes or notes were lost after trial and prior to…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Cole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Robert H. Herndon v. The City of MassillonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Bergerco, U.S.A. v. The Shipping Corporation of India, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Lewis William KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.