Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Giblin v. Detroit Trust Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1935No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 37,978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1ConcurrenceButzel, J.

I concur with the holding in the accompanying opinion (Justice Edward M. Sharpe’s) that the instrument in question is a trust mortgage. After the foreclosure of the first mortgage given by Julius Berman, the title to the property was perfected in the Federal Bond & Mortgage Company through its purchase of the equity of redemption. Berman desired to protect Becker, who held a second mortgage. Berman, however, was unwilling to become personally liable on a new mortgage and bond issue, and accordingly an employee, one Donohue, was procured to act as mortgagor in the new transaction. The Federal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bankers Trust Co. v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. Milton Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. Milton Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Detroit Properties Corp. v. Detroit Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Mount Pleasant Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1992
  2. Matter of Coventry Commons AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  3. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In re P.M.G. PropertiesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  5. In Re Barlum Realty Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API