Legal Opinion

Egger v. Julian Petroleum Corp.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 5, 1927No. 408PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District. Judge.

This action was brought in the state district court and petition for removal was seasonably presented. The plaintiff, by appropriate motioh, now moves to remand, because the defendants have neither pleaded, answered, nor demurred within the 30 days after the filing of the transcript in this court, provided by section 29 of the Judicial Code (28 USCA § 72).

In 1921 Judge Holmes, in Wena Lumber Co. v. Continental Lumber Co. (D. C.) 270 F. 795, and in 1924 Judge Ervin, in Virginia Bridge & Iron Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 300 F.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Cain v. Commercial Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chase v. ErhardtDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1912
  4. Lewis v. Erie R.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Bryan v. BarrigerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1928
  2. Stock Yards Bank v. National Surety Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API