Legal Opinion

Wright v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 9, 2023No. 3:22-cv-01555Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL WRIGHT, § #51175-380, ' Movant, ' ' v. ' CIVIL CASE NO. 3:22-CV-1555-K ' (CRIMINAL NO. 3:15-CR-191-K-1) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ' Respondent. ' MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Movant Michael Wright (“Wright”) filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

and a motion for discovery under Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. He is represented by retained counsel. As detailed here, Movant’s motions to vacate sentence and for discovery are DENIED. I.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Leon Ross, Jr. v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API