Reiff v. Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. This is a proceeding by petition for a writ of certiorari by Joseph Beiff and others, against the City of Portland and others to review proceedings in making a reassessment of property within the city limits, to. pay for street improvements. From a judgment for the defendants affirming the reassessment proceedings and dismissing the writ, plaintiffs appeal. Department 1.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bamsey
On September 21, 1910, the plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to obtain a review of certain proceedings of the council of the City of Portland, had in making a reassessment of the property of certain adjacent lot owners in said city, for the payment of the expenses of á street improvement; the petitioners claiming that said proceedings were illegal and void, for reasons alleged in said petition. The petition contains 27 pages, and hence it is impracticable to set it out in this opinion.
*425On October 7, 1903, the council of the City of Portland passed a resolution for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moore v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Henderson v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Giaconi v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Hughes v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Vanderlip v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. JeffersonOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Olson v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Collins v. City of PhœnixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.