Kish v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
In a personal injury case involving a claim of lost, past and future earnings resulting from an alleged permanent disability from work, evidence that the plaintiff voluntarily chose to retire is often so prejudicial as to be inadmissible; it may be allowed, however, in the court’s discretion in limited circumstances, where it has significant probative value with respect to a validly raised question about the plaintiff’s malingering or motivation for not working. Under the particular circumstances here, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hrnjak v. Graymar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Lanzano v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by23 opinions
- Oden v. Chemung County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ocean Ships, Inc. v. Thomas E. Stiles and Stiles & Wright, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Johnson v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Firmes v. Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Salm v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.