Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2011No. ED 94833PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Tommy Thomas (Thomas) appeals from the motion court’s judgment, following an evidentiary hearing, denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. This Court affirmed Thomas’s convictions, following a jury trial, of first-degree assault and armed criminal action, in Thomas’s direct appeal. State v. Thomas, 204 S.W.3d 687 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). On appeal, Thomas claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to statements made by the prosecutor during closing arguments. Finding no clear error in the motion court’s rulings, we affirm.

We have reviewed the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hernandez v. City of San JoseDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API