Hoffman v. Chester
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
The contentions urged by counsel for the plaintiff in error may be disposed of by answering two questions: (1) Whether that portion of Item 6 of the will attempting to create a trust for James Chester is valid and operative; and (2) whether the administrator, under the terms of the will, has an unlimited power of sale.
A trust estate can not ordinarily be created in property for the benefit of a person sui juris. Code, § 108-114; Armour Fertilizer Works v. Lacy, 146 Ga. 196 (2) (91 S. E. 12). “In an executed trust for the benefit of a person capable of taking and managing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Calbeck v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Munford v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Armour Fertilizer Works v. LacySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- Douglas v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- American Insurance Co. v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Lowell v. BouchillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980