Legal Opinion

Mutual Trust Co. v. Parrish

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1923No. Appeal, No. 141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover the amount of a check for $12,900, given by the latter to Danser & Co., who had endorsed and deposited it with plaintiff, but which was refused payment, when presented to the bank upon which it was drawn. There were no facts' in dispute; the court below directed a verdict for plaintiff for the full amount of its claim; judgment was entered thereon and defendants appeal.

The consideration for the check in suit, was the proceeds of the sale by defendants, for Danser & Co., of cer*424tain securities belonging to the latter. Although…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beaty v. BordwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. Gilmore v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Tagg v. BowmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Tagg v. BowmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. President, Managers, & Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Singer v. PiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. S. Catanzaro & Sons, Inc. v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Parrish v. Mutual Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co. v. Butler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API