Legal Opinion

C & M Developers, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

C & M Developers, Inc. (C & M) appeals from the June 30, 2000 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court), which affirmed the decision of the Bedminster Township (Township) Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) to deny C & M’s substantive challenge to the constitutional validity of the Bedmin-ster Township Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance). C & M claimed that the Ordinance imposes unreasonable restrictions upon the development of single-family detached housing in the Township’s AP-Ag-rieultural Preservation Zoning District (AP district). We affirm.

On or about August 12,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Boundary Drive Associates v. Shrewsbury Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Baker v. Chartiers Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. In re Appeal of Marple Gardens, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. v. Smith, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API