Castillo v. Latham
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.
Appellants sued appellees, B. Mills La-tham, the Law Offices of B. Mills Latham, and Latham and Moss, for failing to file a medical malpractice action before it was barred by limitations. The Castillos alleged that Latham violated the Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), breached a contract of employment, falsely and fraudulently misrepresented himself, and was negligent. After a jury trial, the trial court granted appellees’ motion for instructed verdict and rendered judgment that the Castillos take nothing. By three points of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schmidt v. Persels & Associates, LLC (In re Parks)District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
- Castillo v. Latham, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996