Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Latham

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 29, 1996No. 13-94-316-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

Appellants sued appellees, B. Mills La-tham, the Law Offices of B. Mills Latham, and Latham and Moss, for failing to file a medical malpractice action before it was barred by limitations. The Castillos alleged that Latham violated the Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), breached a contract of employment, falsely and fraudulently misrepresented himself, and was negligent. After a jury trial, the trial court granted appellees’ motion for instructed verdict and rendered judgment that the Castillos take nothing. By three points of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Qantel Business Systems, Inc. v. Custom Controls Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Persels & Associates, LLC (In re Parks)District Court, D. Kansas · 2014
  2. Castillo v. Latham, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API