Legal Opinion

Crouse v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided November 7, 2003No. A-8434PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

A jury intended to convict Adonna L. Crouse of driving under the influence, but it filled out the wrong verdiet form and mistakenly convicted her of the lesser-included offense of reckless driving. The district court judge immediately learned of this error, and allowed the jury to revise its verdiet. Crouse argues that the court should have entered a judgment convicting her of reckless driving without inquiring into the jurors' intent. She also argues that the court staff's ex parte contact with the jury regarding this verdict form deprived her of her constitutional…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Fields v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. HannaganAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Douglas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  2. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2017
  3. Andrea Trescot, M.D. and Algone Center, LLC v. Tabatha Foy, Mark Foy, Michael Foy, and Alissa Foy, a minor childAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API