Legal Opinion

Nike, Inc. v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 22, 2000No. C96-0209CV; CA A97847PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (Nike) initiated this action against defendant Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Company (Northwestern) for breach of an insurance contract covering losses due to employee theft. Northwestern sought summary judgment on the ground that Nike failed to initiate the action within two years of its discovery of the loss, as required by the limitation period specified in the policy. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and Nike appeals. Viewing the facts and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Nike, we conclude that a fact-finder…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. McCormick & Baxter Creosoting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mathies v. HoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gulf USA Corporation v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Nike, Inc. v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API