Legal Opinion

United States v. Turner

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 12, 1976No. CM 433847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COOK, Judge:

Appellant was tried for committing two assaults; one with intent to commit rape and the other with a force likely to produce grievous bodily harm. These crimes were alleged as violations of Articles 134 and 128 (10 U.S.C. §§ 934 and 928), respectively. A general court-martial, consisting solely of a trial judge, found appellant, contrary to his pleas, not guilty of the Article 134 charge, but guilty, in lieu thereof, of a simple assault under Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, (UCMJ), and guilty as charged of the assault originally charged as an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. WiseUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. BoatnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. BeattyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  2. United States v. CookU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. WillisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  4. United States v. LockettU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API