Legal Opinion

Gemological Institute of America, Inc. v. Riddell

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 20, 1957No. 19795PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, Chief Judge.

The above-entitled cause heretofore tried, argued and submitted, is now decided as follows:

Upon the grounds stated in the comments to follow, Judgment will be for the defendant that plaintiff take nothing.

Formal Findings and Judgment to be prepared by counsel for the Government under Local Rule 7. West’s Ann.Cal. Code.

Comment.

I. Relating To All Cases: Liability For Tax

' Separate actions have been brought by the plaintiff to recover alleged overpayment of income tax for the years from 1948 to 1954 as follows:

1948 $ 9,880.01

1949 26,719.81

1950 16,003.64

1951 53,863.72

1953…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Better Business Bureau of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Helvering v. Coleman-Gilbert AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Commissioner v. Scottish American Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Birmingham Business College, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Joe Esco South-West Tire Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Spouting Rock Beach Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  5. Birmingham Business College, Inc. v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API