Legal Opinion

Jones v. Alfa Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 5, 2003No. 1010565PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs Harold Jones and Pam Jones, a married couple ("the Joneses"), appeal: (1) the Rule 12(b)(6), Ala.R.Civ.P., dismissal of their bad faith claim against the defendant Alfa Mutual Insurance Company ("Alfa"); (2) the entry of summary judgment for Alfa on other claims; and (3) the entry of summary judgments for the defendants Gary Bradshaw ("Bradshaw"); Ralph E. Jones ("Engineer Jones"); and Ralph E. Jones and Associates, Inc. ("Jones Associates"). We reverse the Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of the Joneses' bad faith claim against Alfa; reverse in part and affirm in part the summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Potter v. First Real Estate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. LLOYD NOLAND FOUNDATION v. HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Hooper v. COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Jones v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Crosslin v. Health Care Authority of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. McDaniel v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 2100622 (ala.civ.app. 10-28-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API