Legal Opinion

Marra v. Stocker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1989No. 760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is an appeal from judgment for appellees entered May 12, 1989, denying appellants’ motion to declare a sheriff’s sale null and void. Appellants brought the underlying action six months after the mortgage foreclosure by appellee/bank and subsequent sheriffs sale of the property at issue to appellee/Hartman.

On November 22, 1982, Robert S. Apgar and Marie E. Apgar received title to the property in question and subsequently mortgaged it to appellee/bank. The mortgage contained a “due on sale” clause. Appellants later purchased the property at a tax upset sale for $1,614.37;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Churches v. GoldsworthySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Bank of Pennsylvania v. G/N Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. New Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marra v. StockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Marra v. StockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. The Bankcorp Bank v. Fitzgerald, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API