Ferguson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Pro-se Appellant-Petitioner, Harry Ferguson (Ferguson), appeals the trial court’s order denying his Motion to Compel Counsel to Deliver over Money and Papers.
We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ISSUE
Ferguson presents one (1) issue for our review: whether the trial court properly denied his Motion to Compel Counsel to Deliver over Money and Papers.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1980, Ferguson’s convictions for attempted murder, a Class A felony, attempted rape, a Class A felony, and his adjudication as a habitual offender…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pigg v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gregory A. Rose v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Iddings v. ColeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008