Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2002No. 55A05-0204-CR-187PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Pro-se Appellant-Petitioner, Harry Ferguson (Ferguson), appeals the trial court’s order denying his Motion to Compel Counsel to Deliver over Money and Papers.

We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ISSUE

Ferguson presents one (1) issue for our review: whether the trial court properly denied his Motion to Compel Counsel to Deliver over Money and Papers.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1980, Ferguson’s convictions for attempted murder, a Class A felony, attempted rape, a Class A felony, and his adjudication as a habitual offender…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McKim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pigg v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Gregory A. Rose v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Iddings v. ColeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API