Legal Opinion

Walker v. Eason

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1982No. C-1269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We grant the motion for rehearing. Our former opinion and judgment of October 13, 1982, are withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted.

This is a suit to set aside an administrator’s deed and to partition land. The plain tiffs claim title to the land through a deed executed by their mother. The defendants answered seeking to have this deed can-celled. The trial court rendered judgment for defendants cancelling the deed from the mother. The court of appeals affirmed. 631 S.W.2d 560.

On June 3, 1977, Pearl Eason executed a deed conveying a ten-acre tract of land to her ten children as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Walker v. EasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Times Herald Printing Co. v. A.H. Belo Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Turk v. Robles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  3. Yancey v. KoonceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Larry A. Buhman v. James Leigh McGaughy, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. Texas Commerce Bank National Association/Jack Harpster, Independent of the Estate of William R. Harpster v. Jack Harpster, Independent of the Estate of William R. Harpster/Texas Commerce Bank National Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API