Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Clarke
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 2014PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court has broad discretion in supervising disclosure and in resolving discovery disputes (see Conte v County of Nassau, 87 AD3d 558, 559 [2011]; Silberstein v Maimonides Med. Ctr., 77 AD3d 910 [2010]; Rinaldi v Evenflo Co., Inc., 62 AD3d 856 [2009]). However, the Appellate Division may substitute its own discretion for that of the trial court in such matters, even in the absence of an abuse of discretion (see Colantonio v Mercy Med. Ctr., 102 AD3d 649, 650 [2013]; Arpino v F.J.F. & Sons Elec. Co., Inc., 102 AD3d 201, 209 [2012]).
In the present case, given the appellants’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rinaldi v. Evenflo Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Conte v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Silberstein v. Maimonides Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by8 opinions
- Household Fin. Realty Corp. of N.Y. v. CioppaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Lopez v. Maggies Paratransit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Javeed v. 3619 Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- H.P.S. Management Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Middleton v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.