Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzales

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1974No. 1405PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Convicted of two violations of § 54 — 11— 20, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2, Supp.1973), defendant appeals. The claim concerning defendant’s sentence was decided in State v. Herrera, 86 N.M. 224, 522 P.2d 76 (1974). The issues discussed concern instructions on intent and knowledge.

Section 54 — 11-20(A), supra, states the ways a person may traffic in a controlled substance. In this case the trafficking consisted of the sale of heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute it. Section 54-ll-20(B), supra, makes it unlawful for anyone to “intentionally…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GunzelmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. PugaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. State v. GiddingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. CraigNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. CutnoseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. State v. BenderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. State v. JiminezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API