Legal Opinion
Rothschild v. Bierman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.
Plaintiff’s employer, The Bridge Auto Renting Corporation, and the defendant corporation had an agreement with reference to the rental by the former to the latter of a truck. A controversy arose between these corporations regarding certain rentals and credits. On March 20, 1936, The Bridge Auto Renting Corporation, the owner of the truck, gave the plaintiff a letter of identification authorizing him to seize the truck on its behalf. He proceeded to the vicinity of the defendants’ place of business, called a police officer on duty in the neighborhood, identified himself, explained the purpose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hopkinson v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Parr v. LoderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Chernow v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Smith v. New York Anti-Saloon LeagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Toomey v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- James Morrissey, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. National Maritime Union of America, Defendant-Appellant-Appellee, and Joseph CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976