Legal Opinion
Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Nordyke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1944No. 10392PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court on the verdict of the jury for damages in favor of the appellee, an injured seaman.
The complaint in the court below contained two causes of action for damages, both being expressly maintained under the provisions of section 33 of the Act of June 5, 1920, 1 sometimes called the Jones Act.
The first cause of action substantially alleged that at all applicable times plaintiff seaman was a resident of San Jose, California; that the defendant Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc., a corporation, had its office in San Pedro,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Medina v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Vitco v. JoncichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Freida Gust Savard v. Marine Contracting Inc. And Perini CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Mullen v. Fitz Simons & Connell Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.