Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Sonenblick & Sklan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 1948No. 4-8546PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobins, J.

Appellant, a produce dealer of Spring-dale, sued appellees, engaged in the same business at Chicago, for $685.15, balance alleged due on a truck load of poultry. Service of process was obtained by garnishment proceedings against funds of appellees in a bank in Springdale.

Appellees denied any indebtedness to appellant, asserting that a certain check for $2,710, sent to appellant by appellees and cashed by appellant, was in full settlement of the asserted claim of appellant.

The cause was tried to a jury. At the conclusion of all the testimony the court, concluding that tender of said check by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barrentine v. Henry Wrape Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Collier Commission Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. O'Leary v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  4. Cromer v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Yarbrough v. AlstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  2. Salem School District No. 30 v. Unit Structures, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API