Legal Opinion

Collier Commission Co. v. Wright

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee instituted this action against appellant to recover on alleged contracts for the sale of peaches — to recover the unpaid price of six carloads of peaches delivered under contract of sale, and to recover lost profits on several other carloads contracted to be sold and delivered, but which appellant is alleged to have refused to accept. There was a recovery below for the full amount prayed for in the complaint.

The principal controversy relates to the nature of the contract between the parties, appellee claiming that the contract was for sale of the peaches directly by appellee to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Black v. HogsettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Beekman Lumber Co. v. KittrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Shelby v. BurrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Starnes v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. O'Leary v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. American Insurance Union v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Dudley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Hampel-Lawson Mercantile Company v. PoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  5. Bosler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API