Legal Opinion

United States v. Whitney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 28, 2008No. 07-1934PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BESOSA, District Judge.

Appellant Wayne R. Whitney was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) by making a false statement to a firearms dealer during an attempt to purchase a firearm. On appeal, Whitney argues that the trial judge erred in defining the term “knowingly,” by refusing to give an explicit willful blindness instruction. Whitney also challenges the trial judge’s decision to admit evidence that he was arrested for violating a protective order entered against him three weeks before denying the existence of such an order on a federal firearms form. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

O…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. FrankhauserCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Luis MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Raymond Leon CurrierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Delgado-MarreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. LaoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. United States v. GentlesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API