Legal Opinion

Manchester Water Works v. Town of Auburn

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 20, 2010No. 2009-335Published

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The petitioner, Manchester Water Works (Water Works), appeals an order of the Superior Court {Lewis, J.) granting the motion to dismiss its petition for a tax abatement filed by the respondent, the Town of Auburn. The Water Works petitioned for an abatement pursuant to RSA 76:17 (2003) because its assessment did not contain a reduction for a conservation easement placed on its property. We affirm.

The following facts appear in the trial court’s order. The Water Works, a subdivision of the City of Manchester that provides drinking water for the city, owns real property along Lake Massabesic and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  2. Waterville Estates Assoc. v. Town of CamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. McNamara v. HershSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Locke Lake Colony Ass'n v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. MacPherson v. WeinerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API