Legal Opinion

Piper v. Meredith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 4, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

1. In his petition the plaintiff takes the position that he is not taxable because he has only a leasehold interest in the premises. If his lease ran for a definite term of years, the question thus presented would not be free from doubt. In Hampton &c. Co. v. Hampton, 77 N. H. 373, and Granite &c. Co. v. Hampton, 76 N. H. 1, it seems to have been assumed without question by the parties and the court that the interest of a lessee under a long term lease is taxable. But in Donovan v. Haverhill, 247 Mass. 69, it was held that “an assessment may not be laid upon leases as an interest in the land…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Wells v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  3. Wells v. SavannahSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Deraismes v. . DeraismesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Appeal of ReidSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. de la Haba v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America v. MarstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  5. Kimball v. PotterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API