Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from San. Augustine. Tried below before the Hon. A. W. 0. Hicks. The indictment in this case, charged the offence to have been committed on the fifth day of May, 1854. The jury found the defendant guilty, and assessed a fine of $1500, and imprisonment of five days in the county jail.

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The appellant was indicted on the 12th day of October, 1855. The indictment against him contains three counts. The first count charges that the appellant “ did falsely make a certain entry on and in the records of the District Court of San Augustine county, the said records then and there being public records; the said falsely made entry, &c., becoming, and being a part of the public records of the said San Augustine county District Court.” The second count, charges that the appellant “ did fraudulently alter a record of the District Court of San Augustine county, the said record then and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dash v. Van KleeckNew York Supreme Court · 1811

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Ohio v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Fleming v. the Texas Loan AgencyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Fagan & Osgood v. Boyle Ice Machine Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API