Wright v. Wright

Memorandum Opinion

This case involves a marital dispute, and is before us as the result of the last of a series of legal skirmishes.

The Master (Nicholas G. Copadis, Esq.), after an informal hearing wherein the defendant’s contumacious actions as recited in the pleadings were argued, ruled on plaintiff’s motion for contempt as follows:

Motion for contempt is denied, the defendant, by February 23,1978, had made all payments ordered by the Court by its decree effective December 6, 1977.

Under those circumstances, the motion for contempt should have been withdrawn.

Court awards defendant counsel fees…