Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of De Carteret

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 22, 1980No. 3795-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

—Peggy de Carteret appeals from a trial court decision which denied her cotenancy rights in her ex-husband's retirement fund. We reverse.

Peggy de Carteret petitioned the trial court, seeking modification of a previous decree of dissolution. Through the petition she sought an increase in child support as well as partition of her alleged cotenant interest in Alex de Carteret's retirement fund. Peggy originally obtained the decree of dissolution against her husband Alex by a default decree entered in early January 1976. At the time of dissolution Alex had accumulated an interest in a state…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yeats v. Estate of YeatsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ambrose v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Seals v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Witzel v. TenaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of MolvikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Wagers v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API