Legal Opinion

McClaflin v. John Morrell & Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2001No. 21588PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Robert L. McClaflin (Claimant) was awarded odd-lot benefits under the Workers Compensation Act. John Morrell (Employer) appeals that decision. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In 1972, Claimant began working for Employer at its Kansas City location. During the next ten years, Claimant’s job included working in a number of positions, including cutting and running a scribe saw, the bone line, and utility. In 1982, Claimant relocated to Employer’s Sioux Falls location. There, he performed a variety of tasks such as cutting bologna and tails,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Shepherd v. Moorman ManufacturingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kassube v. Dakota LoggingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wise v. Brooks Construction ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sandner v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lagler v. Menard, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Johnson v. Powder River TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API