McClaflin v. John Morrell & Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Robert L. McClaflin (Claimant) was awarded odd-lot benefits under the Workers Compensation Act. John Morrell (Employer) appeals that decision. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In 1972, Claimant began working for Employer at its Kansas City location. During the next ten years, Claimant’s job included working in a number of positions, including cutting and running a scribe saw, the bone line, and utility. In 1982, Claimant relocated to Employer’s Sioux Falls location. There, he performed a variety of tasks such as cutting bologna and tails,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Pulver v. Dundee Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Barkdull v. Homestake Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Shepherd v. Moorman ManufacturingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kassube v. Dakota LoggingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Wise v. Brooks Construction ServicesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Sandner v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Lagler v. Menard, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Johnson v. Powder River TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.