Scannell v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
John Scannell and 16 other Seattle city *176employees in intermittent positions sued the City for back vacation pay. The trial court granted the City's motion for summary judgment and denied the employees' motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of the City's liability to intermittent employees for back vacation pay. The employees appealed. Finding that the City is not liable for back vacation pay, we affirm.
The City of Seattle classifies employee positions as permanent full time, permanent part time, intermittent, and temporary. All of these positions belong to the City's classified…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Krystad v. LauWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Pirak v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re the Estate of LloydWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Tacoma v. Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Puyallup v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Puyallup v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Puyallup v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1982