Legal Opinion

STIDUM v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2011No. SD 31076Published

1Opinion of the Court

DON E. BURRELL, Presiding Judge.

Johnny Stidum (“Movant”) appeals the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 1 motion to set aside his convictions. Movant was convicted after a jury trial of first-degree robbery, armed criminal action, and second-degree robbery. Movant, who was charged with and found to be a persistent offender, was subsequently sentenced to serve concurrent terms of 20, 10, and 20 years in the Department of Corrections. We affirmed Movant’s judgment of conviction and sentence on direct appeal in State v. Stidum, 276 S.W.3d 910 (Mo.App.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API