United States ex rel. Goldschmidt v. Sutherland
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to pay petitioner the sum of $10,236.74, which it was alleged should have been paid to appellant, together with other moneys, on allowance of appellant’s claim for return of money and other property seized by the Alien Property Custodian under the provisions of the Trading with the Enemy Act.
It appears that the petitioner is a German corporation, and as such was an enemy of the United States within the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hawley v. Brownell, Atty. Gen. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Kuttroff v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Kelley v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Von Clemm v. BanuelosDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973