Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Stuart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

deliverd the opinion of the Court.

• Plaintiff sued defendants to recover $193.75 due by account.

Defendants sought by set-off to recover from plaintiff eight items aggregating $518.90.

The trial court entered a judgment in favor of defendants for $325.15, and plaintiff appealed direct to this conrt.'

All of these items grew out of real estate transactions, the eight items pleaded by way of set-off being claims for commissioners on real estate sales. The various deals were consummated 'between February 21 and October 17, 1923. During a part of this period plaintiff was in the employ of defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gormany v. RyanTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cox v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. v. Retail Credit Men's Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Lincoln County Bank v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  3. Mahaffey v. PettySupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  4. Flood v. YandesIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
  5. In Re De Franceschi's EstateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API