Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnone

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 15, 1997No. 95-CR-10276-NGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge.

On June 27, 1997, the Court sentenced defendants Richard Arnone (“Arnone”) and Susan Middleton (“Middleton”). After a twelve day jury trial in May 1996, Arnone and Middleton were convicted of conspiracy and violations of 18 U.S.C. § 215. This memorandum amplifies the findings made on that date, as the basis for the sentences imposed by the Court.

I. STANDARDS

At sentencing, a trial court may determine facts and make judgments based on the credibility of witnesses. 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e); United States v. Ruiz, 905 F.2d 499, 507 (1st Cir.1990). But some restrictions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Fausto D. RuizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Abel A. Mariano, Jr., United States of America v. Barry ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. GrandmaisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Albert Weston, United States of America v. Paul R. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. RostoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API