Legal Opinion
Barrett v. Hay
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 1995No. 93CA2140PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge KAPELKE.
Plaintiff, LaVon Barrett, appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Craig C. Hay (Hay); Holben, Boak, Cooper & Co. (HBC); Craig S. Ciarlelli (Ciarlelli); Hinds Financial Group, Inc. (HFG); Donald W. Hall (Hall); and Prudential Securities, Inc. (Prudential). The trial court entered summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims against defendants were preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (1988). We reverse and remand for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Francisco L. Borges, Treasurer of the State of Connecticut, and State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Lois Gibson v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harmon City, Inc. v. Nielsen & SeniorUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Celebrity Custom Builders v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ragan v. RaganColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Blum v. Pension Investors Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996