Legal Opinion

Harmon City, Inc. v. Nielsen & Senior

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1995No. 940292, 940428PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiffs Harmon City, Inc. (HCI), and Terry Harmon (collectively the Harmons) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Nielsen & Senior, Michael Gottfredson, and D. Jay Curtis and the grant of a motion to dismiss in favor of W. Waldan Lloyd. Similarly, plaintiffs Ray and Lynda Green appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Nielsen & Senior, Gottfredson, Lloyd, and Curtis (collectively the lawyers). 1 These cases arise out of legal advice the lawyers gave to the Har-mons and Ray Green from 1976…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gerosa v. Savasta & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. BluffUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Aurora Credit Services, Inc. v. Liberty West Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gerosa v. Savasta & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API