Legal Opinion

In re Riggs

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 12, 2011No. 2010-1320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RADER, Chief Judge.

The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) returned an appeal to the Examiner, vacated an erroneous docketing notice, and declined to expunge documents from the record. Because the Board’s orders resolved only procedural matters without addressing the merits of any rejection, this Court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Background

Appellants (“Riggs”) applied for a utility patent entitled “Transport Logistics Systems and Methods” on July 27, 2001, and filed the continuation application at issue on December 7, 2004. After an initial round of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Alder Terrace, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Copelands' Enterprises, Inc. D/B/A Copelands' Sports v. Cnv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Hyatt v. DudasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Odyssey Logistics and Tech. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  2. In Re RIGGSCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API