Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burns Holdings, LLC v. Madison County Board of County Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2009No. 33753Published

1DissentJ. Jones, J.

I respectfully dissent. Had Burns merely sought an amendment to the Madison County Comprehensive Plan Map, without also seeking permission to develop its property, I would concur in the result reached by the Court. However, Burns’ purpose in petitioning the county was to obtain permission to develop its property. The zoning change sought by Burns would have made its proposed development project a permitted use under the zoning ordinance. Because Burns is an applicant aggrieved by a governing body’s decision denying permission that would authorize the proposed development of its property, I…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Robison v. Bateman-Hall, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Carpenter v. Twin Falls CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Allison v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API