Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Smookler

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 2, 1962No. Civ. 25582PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a default entered by the clerk and a default judgment rendered by the court.

The complaint was filed in January 1960. Plaintiffs sought to recover for goods sold and delivered. On June 8, 1960, the default of defendants, Harry Smookler and Jack Bulwa, a copartnership doing business under the fictitious firm name of Coast Tire and Salvage Company, was entered. On August 3 the matter was heard as a default and judgment was ordered as prayed. The formal judgment was entered on August 15. On November 28, 1960, a motion to set aside the default and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Yarbrough v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Willett v. Schmeister Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Lyons v. SwopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Shank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Stevenson v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. McCreadie v. ArquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. A & B METAL PRODUCTS v. MacArthur Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API