E. Mishan & Sons, Inc. v. Marycana, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
This is an action arising under the copyright laws of the United States, the principal questions at issue being whether Mary-cana, Inc., formerly Mary’s Magnets Inc. (hereafter “Mary’s”), owns a valid copyright in a calico and eyelet bordered kitchen magnet, and if so, whether its copyright was violated by plaintiff E. Mishan & Sons Inc. (“Mishan”) by Mishan’s distribution of similar kitchen magnets which were copied (with variations) from Mary’s. On the stipulation of the parties, trial was conducted on a submitted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc., David Susskind, Gill Champion, Martin Richards and Heywood GouldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Durham Industries, Inc. v. Tomy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Rebecca Reyher and Ruth Gannett v. Children's Television Workshop and Tuesday Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Ideal Toy Corporation v. Fab-Lu Ltd. (Inc.) and David FaberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dean v. BurrowsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1989
- Jackson v. MPI Home VideoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Kakizaki v. RiedelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Charles W. Ross Builder, Inc. v. Olsen Fine Home Building, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- William A. Graham Co. v. HaugheyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.