Manville Boiler Co. v. Columbia Boiler Co. of Pottstown, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
This action is one based on alleged patent infringement and a claim of unfair competition. Plaintiff filed a Motion For Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, For a Separate Trial on the issue of res judicata (see Document No. 42), its position being that the issues of validity and infringement here involved have been finally determined in its favor as between the parties by the decision in Manville Boiler Co. v. Columbia Boiler Co. of Pottstown, 269 F.2d 600 (4th Cir. 1959), cert. den. 361 U.S. 901, 80 S.Ct. 208, 4L.Ed.2d 156 (1959).
After hearing on the Motion For…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Manville Boiler Company, Incorporated v. Columbia Boiler Company of Pottstown, Incorporated, and Columbia Boiler Company, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Van Brode Milling Co. v. Kellogg Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1953
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Overman Cushion Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster Wheeler Corp. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- McSparran v. Bethlehem Minerals Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Manville Boiler Co. v. Columbia Boiler Co. of Pottstown, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962