Legal Opinion

Adam v. Mengel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

January Term, 1887, No. 17, E. D., before Mercur, Ch. J., Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett, Green, and Clark, JJ. Error to the Common Pleas of Berks County to review a judgment for the plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of scire facias sur mortgage.

Read the full summary

January Term, 1887, No. 17, E. D., before Mercur, Ch. J., Gordon, Paxson, Trunkey, Sterrett, Green, and Clark, JJ. Error to the Common Pleas of Berks County to review a judgment for the plaintiff for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of scire facias sur mortgage. The facts are stated in the following opinion, delivered by Ermentrout, J., upon making absolute the rule for judgment: The defendant seeks to avoid judgment upon the scire facias by alleging lhat Mahlon A. Sellers, Esq., the justice of the peace before whom the mortgage was acknowledged, was incompetent to do so…

1Per curiam

The able and satisfactory opinion of the learned judge fully sustains the conclusion at which he arrived.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Girard Bank v. McLaughlin (In Re McLaughlin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Girard Bank v. McLaughlin (In re McLaughlin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Bell Petition, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1968
  4. Martin's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Sullivan County · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API