Legal Opinion

State v. Frickey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. 05-420PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Paula Frickey (Frickey) appeals from her conviction for driving under the influence in the Twenty-First Judicial District, Ravalli County. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶2 We review whether the “annual” certification requirement of Rule 23.4.214(1), ARM, calls for breath analysis instruments to be laboratory certified once every 365 days or once each calendar year between January 1 and December 31.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Hamilton police officer Nic Painter (Painter) observed Frickey’s vehicle driving erratically in the early morning hours of April 28,2004.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DelaneyMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. IncasholaMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. WoodsMontana Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. PolMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. D. MeyerMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. GieserMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. PoitrasMontana Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API