Legal Opinion
Giano v. Selsky
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1999No. 9:91-cv-00166PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum-Decision and Order
KAHN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff pro se, Julio Giano (“Plaintiff’ or “Giano”), brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) alleging that Defendants violated his right to due process by wrongfully placing him in administrative segregation while he was an inmate at Clinton Correctional Facility (“Clinton”), a maximum security prison in the New York State Correctional Services system. Specifically, Plaintiff avers that the initial decision to place him in administrative segregation and subsequent decisions to continue his placement therein…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Giano v. SelskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Thomas v. CaleroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Smart v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Julio Giano v. Donald Selsky, Director S.H.U., Clinton Correctional Facility Thomas A. Coughlin, Commissioner Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility W. Costello, Deputy of Security, Clinton Correctional Facility J. Wood, Corrections Captain and D. Armitage, Corrections SergeantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001