Legal Opinion
Feamster v. Southern Railway Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided December 12, 1969No. Civ. A. No. C-119-S-68PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
HAYES, District Judge.
This action was tried at Salisbury, North Carolina, and a verdict in favor of the defendant was rendered by the jury on the 8th day of October,. 1969. The plaintiff filed a motion in writing for a new trial, which motion appears of record and which in part was directed to an alleged error in the Court’s charge to the jury, but the Court denied the motion and signed a judgment of dismissal on October 8, 1969. In denying that motion the Court in effect ruled that the defendant was entitled to a directed verdict in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Howell v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Wonnacott v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Weidenfeld v. Pacific Imp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norman and Viola Calhoun v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- High v. R & R Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Collins v. CravenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971