Legal Opinion

Tharp v. Apel International, LLC

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 14, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00210Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CHRISTINA THARP PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-CV-210 APEL INTERNATIONAL, LLC DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on the motion of Defendant Apel International, LLC (“Apel”) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 56(a). Def. Mot. Summ. J., DN 22. Plaintiff Christina Tharp (“Tharp”) filed a response, and Apel replied. Pl. Resp., DN 23; Def. Reply, DN 24. This matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API