Legal Opinion

Voestalpine Rotec LLC v. Sumiriko Ohio, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 28, 2025No. 3:21-cv-01716Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION VOESTALPINE ROTEC LLC, CASE NO. 3:21 CV 1716 Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JAMES R. KNEPP II SUMIRIKO OHIO, INC., et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants. ORDER INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court in this breach of contract case are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 39, 42). Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The matter is fully briefed. See Docs. 43, 44, 45, 46. For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s Motion; Defendants’ Motion is granted in part as to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Doner v. SnappOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API